<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marian Street Park History</title>
	<link>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/</link>
	<description>Preserving Marian Street Park</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasi Dalton</title>
		<link>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-12</link>
		<author>Anastasi Dalton</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>It will absolutely disgust me if any of the proposed plans go ahead, why not utilise the space and clean the area in and around Everleigh St.
Why take away my Sunday reading space.
Obviously you would like to destroy what piece of decent greenery that is left just to make it look like an industrial site even further.
Why did I even bother to invest in Redfern for this type of wasted development to happen.
regards
Anastasi Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will absolutely disgust me if any of the proposed plans go ahead, why not utilise the space and clean the area in and around Everleigh St.<br />
Why take away my Sunday reading space.<br />
Obviously you would like to destroy what piece of decent greenery that is left just to make it look like an industrial site even further.<br />
Why did I even bother to invest in Redfern for this type of wasted development to happen.<br />
regards<br />
Anastasi Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Reading</title>
		<link>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-16</link>
		<author>Susan Reading</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>I have perused the draft plan for development at some length and whilst the plan in general has some merit I wish to object most strongly to the proposed development on Marian Park.

The Redfern area obviously does not have enough open green space and Marian Park represents a welcome relief to the eye in Gibbons Street.  The thought of 5 and 18 storey buildings on this space is abhorrent and I cannot imagine why anybody would consider that such a proposal has merit.  

I already consider the TNT buildings to be an eyesore and the new development would be approximately twice that height.  

The extra concentration of traffic and people in such a small area is inconceivable.  One of the attractions of Redfern is its village atmosphere and diversity and I do not think this will be enhanced by the construction of high rise buildings on a park.  

The construction would turn Gibbons Street into a wind tunnel, it would mean the destruction of over 100 trees, it would mean the removal of an aesthetically pleasing area close to the station and have a negative impact in terms of congestion, both people and traffic.  Natural sunlight will be reduced to the area and it will not enhance Gibbons Street in any way.

I enjoy walking past the park on my way to the station and it is pleasing to be able to see the Watertower building which would be completely blocked by such a development.  Heritage buildings in Redfern should be protected not boxed in.

The opinions of local residents should be taken into account and if you speak to local residents you will be hard pressed to find any support for this ridiculous idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have perused the draft plan for development at some length and whilst the plan in general has some merit I wish to object most strongly to the proposed development on Marian Park.</p>
<p>The Redfern area obviously does not have enough open green space and Marian Park represents a welcome relief to the eye in Gibbons Street.  The thought of 5 and 18 storey buildings on this space is abhorrent and I cannot imagine why anybody would consider that such a proposal has merit.  </p>
<p>I already consider the TNT buildings to be an eyesore and the new development would be approximately twice that height.  </p>
<p>The extra concentration of traffic and people in such a small area is inconceivable.  One of the attractions of Redfern is its village atmosphere and diversity and I do not think this will be enhanced by the construction of high rise buildings on a park.  </p>
<p>The construction would turn Gibbons Street into a wind tunnel, it would mean the destruction of over 100 trees, it would mean the removal of an aesthetically pleasing area close to the station and have a negative impact in terms of congestion, both people and traffic.  Natural sunlight will be reduced to the area and it will not enhance Gibbons Street in any way.</p>
<p>I enjoy walking past the park on my way to the station and it is pleasing to be able to see the Watertower building which would be completely blocked by such a development.  Heritage buildings in Redfern should be protected not boxed in.</p>
<p>The opinions of local residents should be taken into account and if you speak to local residents you will be hard pressed to find any support for this ridiculous idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-23</link>
		<author>Nicola Mansfield</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 04:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>There is another green space which is also slated for development under the draft plan - the Redfern Public Shcool. One half of the site on Cope Street is currently open space. 2 x 4 and 7 storey buildings (with usage including hostels) is planned.

Prior to the release fo the draft plan, residents were assured this space was proposed to be a public park!!!

Cope Street is less than 100m as the crow flies from Marian Park, and its loss will have the same loss of amenity for the residents.

The draft plan has not addressed the BENCHMARKED STANDARDS FOR OPEN SPACE.

Let's remember what the SMH said Nov 29, 2004:

"The residents of Redfern and Waterloo have only half the amount of open space as other inner-city suburbs.

But by the time a secret government plan for redevelopment is finished, they will have less than a quarter - because the existing population will have doubled.

Cabinet papers seen by the Herald show that the plan to squeeze in more people will put more pressure on open space which the Government privately concedes is already too limited.

"With any increase in the local population, open space provision will be well below the benchmarked standard," the papers say.

Get your comments into the mix!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another green space which is also slated for development under the draft plan - the Redfern Public Shcool. One half of the site on Cope Street is currently open space. 2 x 4 and 7 storey buildings (with usage including hostels) is planned.</p>
<p>Prior to the release fo the draft plan, residents were assured this space was proposed to be a public park!!!</p>
<p>Cope Street is less than 100m as the crow flies from Marian Park, and its loss will have the same loss of amenity for the residents.</p>
<p>The draft plan has not addressed the BENCHMARKED STANDARDS FOR OPEN SPACE.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s remember what the SMH said Nov 29, 2004:</p>
<p>&#8220;The residents of Redfern and Waterloo have only half the amount of open space as other inner-city suburbs.</p>
<p>But by the time a secret government plan for redevelopment is finished, they will have less than a quarter - because the existing population will have doubled.</p>
<p>Cabinet papers seen by the Herald show that the plan to squeeze in more people will put more pressure on open space which the Government privately concedes is already too limited.</p>
<p>&#8220;With any increase in the local population, open space provision will be well below the benchmarked standard,&#8221; the papers say.</p>
<p>Get your comments into the mix!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-24</link>
		<author>Bruce Gordon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 04:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marianpark.net/2006/03/01/marian-street-park-history/#comment-24</guid>
					<description>Absolutely Nicola. I too am very concerned about the potential loss of this green zone adjacent to the former Redfern Primary School and say so in my submission to the RWA's CEO, Robert Domm. See my letter on this site at
http://marianpark.net/2006/03/01/step-2-respond/#comment-21
Bruce Gordon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely Nicola. I too am very concerned about the potential loss of this green zone adjacent to the former Redfern Primary School and say so in my submission to the RWA&#8217;s CEO, Robert Domm. See my letter on this site at<br />
<a href="http://marianpark.net/2006/03/01/step-2-respond/#comment-21" rel="nofollow">http://marianpark.net/2006/03/01/step-2-respond/#comment-21</a><br />
Bruce Gordon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
